<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use Search Engine To Compare Popularity of Chinese Websites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html</link>
	<description>Next Generation Web in China</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:16:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alexa toolbar &#38; widgets ranking</title>
		<link>http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-256422</link>
		<dc:creator>alexa toolbar &#38; widgets ranking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 06:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html#comment-256422</guid>
		<description>If you depend on link or site selling as a form of monetization you will definitely want to increase your http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?url=www.fortunehotels.in Alexa rank, because it will increase your bargaining power when it comes to ad pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you depend on link or site selling as a form of monetization you will definitely want to increase your <a href="http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?url=www.fortunehotels.in" rel="nofollow">http://www.alexa.com/data/details/main?url=www.fortunehotels.in</a> Alexa rank, because it will increase your bargaining power when it comes to ad pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tangos</title>
		<link>http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-122584</link>
		<dc:creator>Tangos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 02:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html#comment-122584</guid>
		<description>@John Koorn, yes, it is for checking specific search terms, usually the name of the website. In fact, Yahoo China&#039;s Buzz service has a feature for you to use URL to check the traffic. However, as you may know, Yahoo China&#039;s search service only account for less than 3% market share, I don&#039;t think it would be very useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John Koorn, yes, it is for checking specific search terms, usually the name of the website. In fact, Yahoo China&#8217;s Buzz service has a feature for you to use URL to check the traffic. However, as you may know, Yahoo China&#8217;s search service only account for less than 3% market share, I don&#8217;t think it would be very useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Koorn</title>
		<link>http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-122425</link>
		<dc:creator>John Koorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 05:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html#comment-122425</guid>
		<description>But this is for checking specific search terms, eg, tequila, not specific URL&#039;s like Alexa, right? Or is there a way to see how often Google, Baidu or Yahoo directs traffic to a certain site?

Don&#039;t quite understand how to use this for analyzing...! Help would be appreciated :).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this is for checking specific search terms, eg, tequila, not specific URL&#8217;s like Alexa, right? Or is there a way to see how often Google, Baidu or Yahoo directs traffic to a certain site?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t quite understand how to use this for analyzing&#8230;! Help would be appreciated <img src='http://www.chinawebradar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B2B web sites - where to look for &#8216;real&#8217; data &#124; Business Web Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html/comment-page-1#comment-116924</link>
		<dc:creator>B2B web sites - where to look for &#8216;real&#8217; data &#124; Business Web Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chinawebradar.com/845/use-search-engine-to-compare-popularity-of-chinese-websites.html#comment-116924</guid>
		<description>[...] The China Web 2.0 Review blog has an interesting post today on this topic. It talks about the potential to use search engines to compare web sites&#8217; popularity. The basic principle appears to be that the more times people have searched for a particular site would indicate (a) that it is more popular than others and (b) that its traffic may be comparably higher. Those who rank poorly on these tests would, of course, argue that it&#8217;s simply because those doing the searches are not regular users and that may be a fair point. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The China Web 2.0 Review blog has an interesting post today on this topic. It talks about the potential to use search engines to compare web sites&#8217; popularity. The basic principle appears to be that the more times people have searched for a particular site would indicate (a) that it is more popular than others and (b) that its traffic may be comparably higher. Those who rank poorly on these tests would, of course, argue that it&#8217;s simply because those doing the searches are not regular users and that may be a fair point. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
